This relates strongly to exploration vs exploitation: even in a static environment (if there is such a thing - if the entity stimulates the environment it will always be changing) exploration will need to take place.
In my opinion, there is a difference between the nervous system of animals and humans. The animal system receives signs from a relatively external world. The human system does not receive any signs at all. It generates its own signals that do not sound to animals. And these signals are conventional signs. These signs are only conditional. This means that people are in control of social relationships.
This relates strongly to exploration vs exploitation: even in a static environment (if there is such a thing - if the entity stimulates the environment it will always be changing) exploration will need to take place.
Hi Mykola, nice! I think along similar lines - about direct, active physical experience (via embodiment), response, etc. Here is my writeup: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346786737_Intelligence_-_Consider_This_and_Respond
In my opinion, there is a difference between the nervous system of animals and humans. The animal system receives signs from a relatively external world. The human system does not receive any signs at all. It generates its own signals that do not sound to animals. And these signals are conventional signs. These signs are only conditional. This means that people are in control of social relationships.